Field Notes / Interview series
AI Negotiation
Field Notes
A conversation with Kaspar Korjus about Pactum's digital workforce, AI negotiators in procurement, agent identity and the changing boundaries between human and machine work.
One Big Idea
“You can now change the company behaviour and direction by just chatting with an agent.”
Pactum's agents are moving beyond task automation into a digital workforce: negotiating with suppliers, checking requisitions, enforcing policy and translating a changed strategy into new behaviour across the enterprise.
By the Numbers
The Brief
The conversation, separated into the ideas that matter for people building, governing and managing a machine workforce.
Procurement is already a digital workforce
Pactum's agents are doing the work of a procurement function: requisitions, sourcing, supplier outreach, negotiation and system updates.
Weeks become minutes
Negotiations that took weeks now take ten to fifteen minutes; a five-day requisition SLA becomes a thirty-second response.
Scale is the reliability advantage
A machine can check two hundred policies on every requisition and negotiate with ten thousand suppliers while humans prioritise the few they can reach.
The hard part is change management
The technology is capable. The difficult work is deciding which roles remain human, where agents work alongside people and how the transition happens.
Manage agents like employees
Give each agent a role, boundaries, measures of success and the data access it needs. A free workforce without context can harm a company rapidly.
Agents need their own identity
Estonia is exploring digital identities that let agents act with delegated rights without handing them a person's full access to banks, systems or government.
Price is only one term in the deal
Agents can exchange what each side values: payment terms, contract length, allowances, responsible sourcing and verifiable supplier credentials.
The company is still accountable
An autonomous agent does not become a liability shield. The company or human whose authority it uses remains responsible for the action and its consequences.